Why the Cool Kids Can Never Forgive the Tabi Theft

All this is funneled through Dougé’s narration, leaving questions galore. How did the man target the right size? Did he really think he could get away with it? Had he learned nothing from “West Elm Caleb”? The Tabi swiper gets no nuanced biography here; depending on your degree of sympathy for property crime, he is merely a clownish dolt, an enterprising popinjay or a graceful, sartorially minded sociopath. Neither villain nor victim is the main character of this saga. The leading role belongs to another: the world’s most reviled shoes.

Here’s where I disclose: I am a member of the cloven-hoofed. I own, and adore, Tabis.

Tabis provoke near-universal squirms from onlookers, which is precisely the source of their appeal. Margiela, inspired by 15th-century Japanese design, first sent them down the runway in 1988. A long, leather-seamed cleft segregates the big toe from the rest of the foot, an arrangement that is apparently capable of triggering monstrous discomfort in the human brain. Walking around in Tabis is an act of aggression, akin to whispering “moist” and “cusp” into people’s ears over and over. This animalistic silhouette is a semi-sexual, quasi-vaginal trompe l’oeil that embarrasses the onlooker twice: once for looking so closely at the wearer’s feet, and again for being so conventional as to find the view shocking.

Part of the reason for their MacBook Air price tag — which, in my defense, can come down significantly if you charge into sale season with fast fingers — is their role as both a cipher and a Sorting Hat of taste. Like Patagonia vests or Telfar bags, Tabis come freighted with tribal meaning. To embrace the split toe is to consciously buck the mainstream. This has made Tabis a kind of secret handshake for an in-crowd of fashion buffs and cultural connoisseurs: “Look at me,” the shoes proclaim, “a creative person with highbrow sensibilities, rebelling against the normies.” As the fashion writer Rachel Tashjian put it, Tabis are “to the art world what Allbirds are to tech.” They belong to the broad category of IYKYK (“if you know, you know”) fashion. But while most such garments are militantly subtle, broadcasting only to fellow insiders — the Row’s unbranded tailoring, black T-shirts from Rick Owens, anything Comme des Garçons (not from Play) or Céline (before Hedi Slimane nixed the accent) — Tabis are an even ruder in-joke: They openly dare you to consider them ugly or revolting, exposing yourself as a commoner.

After the Tabi-swiper story went viral — just before New York Fashion Week, no less — the search term “Tabis” crested to a five-year peak on Google, suggesting many of the saga’s followers may have been freshly discovering the shoe. And yet the frenzied discourse around the theft has been flooded with chest-beating, virtue-signaling IYKYKism. For days, cool-crowd magazines and influencers pumped out softly patronizing “explainers” aimed at people insufficiently hip to understand dropping 165 pumpkin spice lattes’ worth of cash on an unsightly shoe. Even spectators fought to prove themselves as knowing aesthetes. (“How he got the shoes outside your apartment” reads one of the top comments on Dougé’s video, to which another confidently responds, “fashion guys always have their lil purse.”) Onlookers seemed to care less about retrieving stolen property or exposing misbehavior than about closing ranks, patrolling and reinforcing the boundaries of the in-group. Perhaps the thief had displayed good taste in desiring the Tabis but offended the cognoscenti by approaching them in such a deceitful way: Not only did he steal Dougé’s totem of belonging, but he tried to give it to someone else. What the man purloined wasn’t just a pair of shoes but something like an emblem of identity. The tribe automatically rejected this, balking not just at a thief but at that all-too-embarrassing figure: the try-hard.

There’s a built-in paradox to IYKYK clothes, though: The more you wear things, the more people come to know about them. Tabis, despite their prideful nonconformity, have been worn by Nick Jonas and Dua Lipa and the marquess of the mainstream, Kylie Jenner; even the maladroit fashionista of Netflix’s “Emily in Paris” has a pair. Virgil Abloh once got around this type of problem by differentiating between the “tourists” who pile on to an item of cult intrigue and the “purists” who live and breathe it. But who ever begins as a “purist”? When a discerning art friend first introduced me to Tabis, I feigned indifference, sensing this was a litmus test of some sort. It was only after studying up on the hooves’ vestiary lore that I began to genuinely appreciate their mischief. Perhaps the Tabi-swiper saga resonated so widely because it was a reminder of how we all start off stealing and faking our way into sophistication — working long and hard to mimic the more polished palates of others, all the while pretending our good taste came naturally.

Sumber: www.nytimes.com